Discussion:
City abortion funding
(too old to reply)
Allen
2023-06-12 12:50:59 UTC
Permalink
City abortion funding saves city school tax, so much so that cities can then fund country abortions as well, all without answering to country voters.
In this way, my guess is that 10 cities can cover the USA and 25 can cover the world.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/4992336894196490
Lenona
2023-06-14 16:30:32 UTC
Permalink
I suspect the above math is a bit off.

BUT...if at least some conservatives can agree that, in the name of slowing down the spread of incurable diseases, it's best - and cost-effective - to provide FREE condoms to the public, you'd think they'd realize that it's just as important to fund safe, effective female contraception for the poor. Or at least BC should be cheaper.
Allen
2023-06-17 12:11:04 UTC
Permalink
Cities don't need to recruit conservatives, and how is the math off? City school tax is HUGE and so are the potential savings, plus, after the initial precedent, the cities most likely to fund abortions are the ones with really urban lifestyles and values, and those are the biggest cities with the biggest potential savings. And providing that ALL school tax savings go back into more abortion funding (this may take some convincing), a small number of big cities become capable of funding every abortion on Earth, including travel from where abortions are banned, such as Afghanistan. The numbers are guesses as stated, but they are in the correct ballpark.
Loading...