Discussion:
LAURA LINGER takes on Kate Gosselin
(too old to reply)
The Assassination of Ice Breaker By the Coward Laura Linger
2008-06-30 19:22:02 UTC
Permalink
On the blog Gosselins Without Pity, Laura Linger made the following strange
comment in reference to Kate and John's decision to have a reality show
about their family:

https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6454349132986954975&postID=2579713046441875267&isPopup=true

*******
What product are they then selling? What reason do they have to be on
television, if not for the children?

It's not about free enterprise, especially when their "right" to engage in
it is at the expense of the mental and physical well-being, both in the long
and short term, of innocent children.
June 29, 2008 7:18 PM
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is what I don't understand: what "right" does Laura Linger have to
criticize what Kate and John are doing with their *own* children on their
own show (Jon and Kate Plus 8), when Laura's sister-in-law
(http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=122886935)
begged Laura to not put pictures of her children on her blog, to please not
disparage the war in Iraq while her husband (Laura's brother) was serving
over there, and to please not put the kids through mental and physical
anguish by constantly revealing personal details of Andrew's (Laura's
brother) mistakes in life, his private dealings, his failures, or Andrew's
marriage all over Laura's blog? Somehow Laura got the idea that the lives of
others (her husband, her husband's family, her nieces, nephews,
sister-in-law, brother and sister) were perfectly suitable fodder for her
blog (http://lauralinger.blogspot.com)

Laura has emotionally traumatized her niece and nephew (NOT EVEN HER OWN
KIDS, but someone elses) to the point where Laura's sister-in-law has cut
off all contact with her and refuses to let Auntie Laura visit, telephone,
or even send gifts to, the children. What could Laura possibly have to say
on the matter of child-rearing? She has none, and has shown the utmost
contempt for the children around her. For example: Did Laura care about the
well-being of the toddler in the stroller on her last trip to Las Vegas,
when the mother asked Laura to please put out her cigarette, and Laura
laughed at her and blew the smoke back in the face of the mother (and of
course the toddler's lungs were exposed to Laura's filthy habit as well).
Laura bragged about this incident on Usenet, so there's probably an archive
of it somewhere. Laura's concern for the "mental and physical well-being" of
the Gosseling children is much like the inside of Laura's house: a
smokescreen.

-------------------------------------
Icebreaker
"My left tit is bigger than my right tit. The Boob Lady can suck either one.
Stupid bint." --- Laura Linger, "Defective Breasts", November 29, 2006,
(thebipolarview.wordrpress.com)
Hillary Spanglieklinton
2008-06-30 20:03:56 UTC
Permalink
On Jun 30, 12:22 pm, "The Assassination of Ice Breaker By the Coward
Post by The Assassination of Ice Breaker By the Coward Laura Linger
On the blog Gosselins Without Pity, Laura Linger made the following strange
comment in reference to Kate and John's decision to have a reality show
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6454349132986954975&postID=2...
*******
What product are they then selling? What reason do they have to be on
television, if not for the children?
It's not about free enterprise, especially when their "right" to engage in
it is at the expense of the mental and physical well-being, both in the long
and short term, of innocent children.
June 29, 2008 7:18 PM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------­--------------------------------------
This is what I don't understand: what "right" does Laura Linger have to
criticize what Kate and John are doing with their *own* children on their
own show (Jon and Kate Plus 8), when Laura's sister-in-law
(http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&frie...)
begged Laura to not put pictures of her children on her blog, to please not
disparage the war in Iraq while her husband (Laura's brother) was serving
over there, and to please not put the kids through mental and physical
anguish by constantly revealing personal details of Andrew's (Laura's
brother) mistakes in life, his private dealings, his failures, or Andrew's
marriage all over Laura's blog? Somehow Laura got the idea that the lives of
others (her husband, her husband's family, her nieces, nephews,
sister-in-law, brother and sister) were perfectly suitable fodder for her
blog (http://lauralinger.blogspot.com)
Laura has emotionally traumatized her niece and nephew (NOT EVEN HER OWN
KIDS, but someone elses) to the point where Laura's sister-in-law has cut
off all contact with her and refuses to let Auntie Laura visit, telephone,
or even send gifts to, the children. What could Laura possibly have to say
on the matter of child-rearing?  She has none, and has shown the utmost
contempt for the children around her. For example: Did Laura care about the
well-being of the toddler in the stroller on her last trip to Las Vegas,
when the mother asked Laura to please put out her cigarette, and Laura
laughed at her and blew the smoke back in the face of the mother (and of
course the toddler's lungs were exposed to Laura's filthy habit as well).
Laura bragged about this incident on Usenet, so there's probably an archive
of it somewhere. Laura's concern for the "mental and physical well-being" of
the Gosseling children is much like the inside of Laura's house: a
smokescreen.
-------------------------------------
Icebreaker
"My left tit is bigger than my right tit. The Boob Lady can suck either one.
Stupid bint." --- Laura Linger, "Defective Breasts", November 29, 2006,
(thebipolarview.wordrpress.com)
PERFECTLY STATED, Icebreaker. You should send this post via email to
the lady who runs the Gosselins Without Pity blog, in fact, so that
she can see and known what Laura is truly about without having her
made to feel that her blog has been intruded upon by a Laura-Opposer.
That way the blog owner can make her mind up with the FACTS at hand
about Laura (and about Laura's hypocrisy regarding parenting, marriage
and children) HERSELF. Is there a "contact me at" link at that blog?
If so, you ought to do that lady a favor and let her know about this.


She also deserves to know about Laura's anti-kid postings (like
getting them in trouble on airplanes, etc.) over at alt.support.child-
free, an online community for folks without kids, yet Laura, who's
posted there off and on over the years seems to be their most biased
and acerbic poster. It's not a community that is about child hatred,
in other words, it's about free thinking choice, yet Laura's tried to
turn it into a hate zone time and again and has miserably FAILED as
far as this reader is concerned.




S*Babykins
The God of Odd Statements, Henry Schmidt
2008-07-02 10:21:30 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:22:02 -0400, The Assassination of Ice Breaker By
Post by The Assassination of Ice Breaker By the Coward Laura Linger
On the blog Gosselins Without Pity, Laura Linger made the following
strange comment in reference to Kate and John's decision to have a reality
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6454349132986954975&postID=2579713046441875267&isPopup=true
*******
What product are they then selling? What reason do they have to be on
television, if not for the children?
It's not about free enterprise, especially when their "right" to engage in
it is at the expense of the mental and physical well-being, both in the
long and short term, of innocent children. June 29, 2008 7:18 PM
Reality TV is a blight on society, and cursing one's children by forcing
them to become part of it is child abuse. Fame is highly over-rated.
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Chung Convict #28; Usenet Ruiner #5
Demon Lord of Confusion <-- last attempt to watch any reality TV was
years ago (utterly dreadful crap -- scripted shows are where it's at)
Official Chung Demon; Top Asshole #3
COOSN-029-06-71069; Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Lits Slut #16
Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4 AUK
Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2; AUK Hate Machine Cog #19 Anonymous
Psycho Criminal #18
The posting nym is best removed from my posting address if your goal is to
speak with me in private.
Supreme High Overlord of rec.radio.*
Chuck Lysaght: Tarred & Feathered!
"Atheists are people who have no invisible means of support" Join my
RuneScape clan!
http://z11.invisionfree.com/Holy_Pretzel_Cabal/index.php Full name of
clan: Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet And Usenet
Terrorist Pretzel

"I know how you special busboys are.
You're crazy." -- John "special busboy" Wentzky, in Message-ID:
<HMb3k.2413$***@bignews4.bellsouth.net>

"Roe V Wade has zero bearing on my existence other than it affects it
adversely."
-- Johnny Wentzky never had much truck with "logic". Message-ID:
<V6xNe.27650$***@bignews5.bellsouth.net>

"Fredbot == SameAsB4 == TGOOS

"You are stalking me, even after I thrashed ya." -- PorchMonkey4Life,
a veritable combination of Sherlock Holmes and Doc Savage for the 21st
Century. No, really. Would I lie? MID: <zaUqh.2972$***@trnddc02>

"He unleashes a fecal explosion he time he posts. He uses so many nyms
because he gets beaten so easily and so convincingly in flame wars and
tries to hide behind nyms in the hopes of getting a fresh start. To bad
for him that his lameness keep shining through like a beacon for all
tards (e.g., SameAs$B4, Demon Spawn, Barbara's Pus$y, FredBot,
TGOOS, ......, etc)" -- Monkey-man identifies <jitter> as me, among
others, in broken English, in MID: <Z_Xqh.3167$***@trnddc02>

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of the above k00k
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

"Q: What do you call someone in the White House who is honest, caring,
and well-read?
A: A tourist." -- Anonymous

"It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur
reached new heights, in Message-ID:
<***@69.28.186.121>
"Immorality: The morality of those who are having a better time." -- H.
L. Mencken

"Consider that language a moment. 'Purposefully and materially
supported hostilities against the United States' is in the eye of the
beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astonishingly
impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by
this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a
hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other
part of the so-called 'War on Terror.'

"If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be
deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the
United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against
Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall
you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House
members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize
investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same
designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them
up." -- William Rivers Pitt

"It has become clear in recent months that a critical mass of the American
people have seen through the lies of the Bush administration; with the
president's polls at an historic low, growing resistance to the war Iraq,
and the Democrats likely to take back the Congress in mid-term elections,
the Bush administration is on the ropes. And so it is particularly
worrying that President Bush has seen fit, at this juncture to, in effect,
declare himself dictator." -- Frank Morales
http://www.uruknet.biz/?p=m27769&hd=0&size=1&l=e&fark

"Right you are correct. Someone hooked me. I do believe in building
relationships. That is what Christians are required to do. I am amoral.
I am sure you know what that means. So are Scorpios. I am being
'protected' by the Formosa Rule because of my 'mental illness'. I am not
targeting 'teh Mop Jockey'. You are and you are using me as a bait.
Please stop. I have my own fish to reel in. Leave me alone. It is my hope
that I will be able to catch a fish and reel it in for you. Once my
retired bishop thought I was fishing for him and he took the bait, alas
it wasn't me and that spelled the demise of our relationship. Have a
little bit more faith in me. An Eastern Orthodox bishop thought I was
fishing for him and willingly, proudly and defiantly took the bait on
public record, and it wasn't even me. Give me a break." -- Atlanta
Olympiada "Erica" Kane yammered in
Message-ID: <***@news.alt.net>

"It does to a certain extant physically and theoretically
it holds even into the quantum but there observational confirmation is
limited or non existent. That's the problem and the major stumbling
block to field unification. For Dr. Einstein held out that a physical
based field theory should be sought out and not left to quantum
uncertainty of how the universe primly base works. Man made coordinate
systems are fine without knowing from where or what is the base essence
of what the space as deduced field is composed of, but not totally
satisfactory. Anomalies keep space cropping up and scientists have to
keep adjusting for these unexpected events. It's like a blind man that
has memorized his physical surroundings to a point he feels very
comfortable until that one new or unexpected event pops up and he's lost
and fumbling." -- nightbat, in one of his more lucid moments.
Message-ID: <b27b0$45ed14a7$46e3a646$***@COMTECK.COM>

To Whom It May Concern: Att'y Michael James Cranston stalker kook, Esq.,
is a dogfucker and Kook of the Month for March 2007
Janice
2008-07-02 15:56:20 UTC
Permalink
In article <tnaak.24$***@newsfe06.lga>,
"The Assassination of Ice Breaker By the Coward Laura Linger"
Post by The Assassination of Ice Breaker By the Coward Laura Linger
On the blog Gosselins Without Pity, Laura Linger made the following strange
comment in reference to Kate and John's decision to have a reality show
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6454349132986954975&postID=2579713046
441875267&isPopup=true
*******
What product are they then selling? What reason do they have to be on
television, if not for the children?
It's not about free enterprise, especially when their "right" to engage in
it is at the expense of the mental and physical well-being, both in the long
and short term, of innocent children.
June 29, 2008 7:18 PM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------
This is what I don't understand: what "right" does Laura Linger have to
criticize what Kate and John are doing with their *own* children on their
own show (Jon and Kate Plus 8), when Laura's sister-in-law
(http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=122
886935)
begged Laura to not put pictures of her children on her blog, to please not
disparage the war in Iraq while her husband (Laura's brother) was serving
over there, and to please not put the kids through mental and physical
anguish by constantly revealing personal details of Andrew's (Laura's
brother) mistakes in life, his private dealings, his failures, or Andrew's
marriage all over Laura's blog? Somehow Laura got the idea that the lives of
others (her husband, her husband's family, her nieces, nephews,
sister-in-law, brother and sister) were perfectly suitable fodder for her
blog (http://lauralinger.blogspot.com)
Laura has emotionally traumatized her niece and nephew (NOT EVEN HER OWN
KIDS, but someone elses) to the point where Laura's sister-in-law has cut
off all contact with her and refuses to let Auntie Laura visit, telephone,
or even send gifts to, the children. What could Laura possibly have to say
on the matter of child-rearing? She has none, and has shown the utmost
contempt for the children around her. For example: Did Laura care about the
well-being of the toddler in the stroller on her last trip to Las Vegas,
when the mother asked Laura to please put out her cigarette, and Laura
laughed at her and blew the smoke back in the face of the mother (and of
course the toddler's lungs were exposed to Laura's filthy habit as well).
Laura bragged about this incident on Usenet, so there's probably an archive
of it somewhere. Laura's concern for the "mental and physical well-being" of
the Gosseling children is much like the inside of Laura's house: a
smokescreen.
-------------------------------------
Icebreaker
"My left tit is bigger than my right tit. The Boob Lady can suck either one.
Stupid bint." --- Laura Linger, "Defective Breasts", November 29, 2006,
(thebipolarview.wordrpress.com)
And most pathetic. Commit yourself to a psych ward, Laura Linger.
Loading...